1998-12-14 - Re: German government press release on Wassenaar

Header Data

From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
To: Alexander Kjeldaas <astor@guardian.no>
Message Hash: 2ae8ffab232b3279c0dacf7d46a6020a8921c76d91e048db6cfeb348e85f1eb2
Message ID: <3674C269.BBE545D5@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Reply To: <v04020a1bb2941c8e1795@[139.167.130.246]>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-14 07:47:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 23:47:40 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 23:47:40 -0800 (PST)
To: Alexander Kjeldaas <astor@guardian.no>
Subject: Re: German government press release on Wassenaar
In-Reply-To: <v04020a1bb2941c8e1795@[139.167.130.246]>
Message-ID: <3674C269.BBE545D5@stud.uni-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 1762
Lines: 53


Alexander Kjeldaas wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 08:04:00PM +0100, Ulf Mller wrote:
> >
> > 2.) The government has acknowledged that public domain software
> > remains unrestricted. This also applies to copyrighted software such
> > as PGP which "has been made available without restrictions upon its
> > further dissemination".
> 
> I applied for an examination of the Open Source definition to the
> department for foreign affairs in Norway.  The response (no surprise)
> was that Open Source is compliant with what the Wassenaar-agreement
> calls "public domain" software.

I posed a question in this direction in sci.crypt in the thread
'(fwd) Strike to protest Wassenaar!' to which Doug Stell gave a
follow-up on 11 Dec 14:19:24 which is attached below.

M. K. Shen

____________________________________________________


On Fri, 11 Dec 1998 11:50:12 +0100, Mok-Kong Shen
<mok-kong.shen@stud.uni-muenchen.de> wrote:

>>    2. "In the public domain".
>
>This is indeed very interesting. If someone implements a strong 
>crypto algorithm with 128 key bits and places it on an ftp-server 
>for free download, then that is by definition in the 'public domain' 
>and hence according to the above not subject to export regulations. 
>Could someone explain this paradox?

a. "Public domain" is defined in the document you refer to, by the
indentations under Item 1.

b1. 128-bit software is never exempt.

b2.  64-bit software is exempt if you meet ALL of the other criteria.

b3. The limit of exemption is 56 bits, if you do not meet all of the
other criteria.

See my other response where this is explained from Catgory 5 - Part 2.
Unfortunately, one key statement is missing from the General Software
Note and it contains the magic word "ALL."

doug





Thread