1998-12-10 - Re: knapsack….

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
To: “Bernardo B. Terrado” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 54124646323358bdb7f8f470c4c5044a8fdf99a10896e1d8fde8e24d372029e3
Message ID: <19981210114517.A8878@weathership.homeport.org>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.981208170008.2860A-100000@mudspring.uplb.edu.ph>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-10 17:21:19 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 01:21:19 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 01:21:19 +0800
To: "Bernardo B. Terrado" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: knapsack....
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.981208170008.2860A-100000@mudspring.uplb.edu.ph>
Message-ID: <19981210114517.A8878@weathership.homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Chor-Rivest was broken at Crypto98.  Don't use any knapsack
algorithms.

Adam


On Tue, Dec 08, 1998 at 05:04:22PM +0800, Bernardo B. Terrado wrote:
| Where could I find the algorithm (per se) for
| Merkle-Hellman knapsack ?
| (if it is not for free just say so) :)
| 
| I've read in Mr. Schneier's book that Chor-Rivest knapsack is secure
| (unless for some specializerd attack). Is it still as secure today as the
| latter years?
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| Bernie
| 

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume






Thread