1998-12-29 - RE: More (and last) on And you thought it was Larry Flynt . . .

Header Data

From: “Blanc” <blancw@cnw.com>
To: <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Message Hash: 57ea658b08ad085243a3c61b53494e856e4222bf017cdd3e44c3d7493cb3b872
Message ID: <000301be32f9$bf3f6140$418195cf@blanc>
Reply To: <25683280FF49D2119B480000C0AD59009DCAB1@mo3980po13.ems.att.com>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-29 07:33:36 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 15:33:36 +0800

Raw message

From: "Blanc" <blancw@cnw.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 15:33:36 +0800
To: <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Subject: RE: More (and last) on And you thought it was Larry Flynt . . .
In-Reply-To: <25683280FF49D2119B480000C0AD59009DCAB1@mo3980po13.ems.att.com>
Message-ID: <000301be32f9$bf3f6140$418195cf@blanc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



This has to be the decade of Sex, so many public figures have been brought down,
one way or another, by it (funny thing I heard on the news from Russia -  that
if they were to discover that Yelsin had had an affair with a young woman, at
least they would know that he was still alive).

Perhaps the effects of all this under-the-covers publicity could convince some
VIPs of the imperative need for un-adulteratedH^H^H^H^Hextremely strong crypto
in theirH^H^H^H^H^ "all our" lives.  At least for some types of communication;
they still haven't figured out how to keep their paramours from telling everyone
about their adventures in wonderland.

I wonder if Stewart Baker was sending out that memo with glee?
And why did he send it to Dave Farber?

   ..
Blanc





Thread