From: “Jack Rusher” <jar@rci.net>
To: <apache-ssl@lists.aldigital.co.uk>
Message Hash: 6e4d39ee1b38aa78da94ce9102dbb2a114d3b540a74880705f4808bd9af08084
Message ID: <001d01be3039$2d9410a0$31a7fea9@oemcomputer>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-25 19:27:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 03:27:46 +0800
From: "Jack Rusher" <jar@rci.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 03:27:46 +0800
To: <apache-ssl@lists.aldigital.co.uk>
Subject: OpenSSL
Message-ID: <001d01be3039$2d9410a0$31a7fea9@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>I'm familiar with some background and some of the issues. Unfortunately,
>what we are faced with is the idea that one group wants to "own" the
>concept of an Open SSL project. This is certainly not the way to start
>a successful, open source, group-based project.
Hey, everybody, here is a novel idea:
Why don't we look at this as a great opportunity to make some really good
free software that will make all of our lives easier. It is time for the
free SSL implementation to move into a larger (and more continously updated)
group project. OpenSSL is a great idea, a great name for the idea, and it
is the right time to do it. So, how about we stop looking at this as a
pissing contest between some strong personalities? There are alot of
talented developers on this list, and I think that we would all be better
off working together than turning into a bunch of bitter, petty, ego driven
camps that are primarily concerned with proving how large their genitals
are.
What I am trying to say is, if (for instance) Ben and Ralph would like to
sit down for a pint and make nice with one another, I am buying. Name the
pub, in the neutral country of your choice, and we are there. ;-)
j.
Return to December 1998
Return to ““Jack Rusher” <jar@rci.net>”
1998-12-25 (Sat, 26 Dec 1998 03:27:46 +0800) - OpenSSL - “Jack Rusher” <jar@rci.net>