1998-12-08 - RE: The problem with ‘Gilmore’s RSAREF’ site… (fwd)

Header Data

From: Matthew James Gering <mgering@ecosystems.net>
To: “Cypherpunks (E-mail)” <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Message Hash: 85f527c20fd358ebbfad9bff6c20e33503e721e86485b2a2297dcc91900b491f
Message ID: <5F152E6E8E6FD21195DF00104B2425AD02B339@yarrowbay.chaffeyhomes.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-08 23:20:36 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 07:20:36 +0800

Raw message

From: Matthew James Gering <mgering@ecosystems.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 07:20:36 +0800
To: "Cypherpunks (E-mail)" <cypherpunks@cyberpass.net>
Subject: RE: The problem with 'Gilmore's RSAREF' site... (fwd)
Message-ID: <5F152E6E8E6FD21195DF00104B2425AD02B339@yarrowbay.chaffeyhomes.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




> Further, he's not willing to extend his legal protection to help 
> others.

Has there been any indication that the EFF would not support or help someone
being persecuted for crypto-export disobedience? I wouldn't rely on such
charity, nor is charity ever obligatory (that's socialism), but what reason
do you have to discount it?

The essence of civil disobedience is many many individual targets, not one
organization.

> When is YOUR CDR node going up 

Fine, if that is the source if your righteousness, I will put one up 1Q99. I
won't even play the my network is bigger than your network pissing match,
but I will put my money where my mouth is if you think hosting a list node
is that big of a deal.

I'm am not critical of any contribution, but I will be critical of someone
chastising others contributions simply because they would do it differently.
A call to arms to protect liberty is not a draft. If you don't want a gun,
then don't take it, I won't even call you a Tory.

	Matt





Thread