From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c550529ad4b9edb5e65fcf86922e3887c6b85c89f366167b2f8cd9b38f055625
Message ID: <199812132107.WAA14717@replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-13 21:06:03 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 13:06:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 13:06:03 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: steganography detection hazard?
Message-ID: <199812132107.WAA14717@replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Length: 473
Lines: 35
Suppose you take your plaintext, encrypt it,
then spread the bits across an image as the LSBs.
The LSBs will, if you've used a decent cipher,
have perfectly uniform distribution.
The 'noise' LSBs in a chunk of *digitized* bits will show
a *uniform* distribution. (As indeed will the cipher's blocks,
or any bitchunk larger or smaller.)
Therefore an entropy test (see Maurer) will discriminate
between the two.
Please prove me wrong.
--Stegosaur
Return to December 1998
Return to “Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>”
1998-12-13 (Sun, 13 Dec 1998 13:06:03 -0800 (PST)) - steganography detection hazard? - Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>