1998-12-26 - RE: [ssl-users] OpenSSL

Header Data

From: “Lucky Green” <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: <jar@rci.net>
Message Hash: f5cdaff8d5068d19f7454f49bd99d1b00bae2c5abc52def773e369658a4de4cf
Message ID: <000201be308c$1c01fe80$f3176dc2@lucky.zks.net>
Reply To: <CMM.0.90.4.914636623.jaltman@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-26 05:06:53 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 13:06:53 +0800

Raw message

From: "Lucky Green" <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1998 13:06:53 +0800
To: <jar@rci.net>
Subject: RE: [ssl-users] OpenSSL
In-Reply-To: <CMM.0.90.4.914636623.jaltman@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>
Message-ID: <000201be308c$1c01fe80$f3176dc2@lucky.zks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Make that another vote for OpenTLS.

--Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
  PGP 5.x  encrypted email preferred

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-coderpunks@toad.com [mailto:owner-coderpunks@toad.com]On
> Behalf Of Jeffrey Altman
> Sent: Saturday, December 26, 1998 02:44
> To: Jack Rusher
> Cc: sw-mod-ssl@engelschall.com; apache-ssl@lists.aldigital.co.uk;
> cypherpunks@cyberpass.net; coderpunks@toad.com; cryptography@c2.net
> Subject: Re: [ssl-users] OpenSSL
> 
> 
> OpenTLS would be a much better name given the standards process in the
> IETF.
> 
> 
>     Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer * Kermit-95 for 
> Win32 and OS/2
>                  The Kermit Project * Columbia University
>               612 West 115th St #716 * New York, NY * 10025
>   http://www.kermit-project.org/k95.html * 
> kermit-support@kermit-project.org
> 
> 
> 





Thread