1998-12-25 - Re: EAY, SSLeay, and Open Source (Re: [ssl-users] Re: C2Net announces OpenSSL Project)

Header Data

From: Soren <sorens@workmail.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: f8ac44fabe53d2a510103a1cca0e8ccd4d05937b4aae06156a538932e4d783e5
Message ID: <368302FD.81FE80B3@workmail.com>
Reply To: <199812242235.WAA09814@server.eternity.org>
UTC Datetime: 1998-12-25 02:32:46 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 10:32:46 +0800

Raw message

From: Soren <sorens@workmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1998 10:32:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: EAY, SSLeay, and Open Source (Re: [ssl-users] Re: C2Net announces OpenSSL Project)
In-Reply-To: <199812242235.WAA09814@server.eternity.org>
Message-ID: <368302FD.81FE80B3@workmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain





Adam Back wrote:

> This is confusing, several people have alluded that there will be no
> future versions of SSLeay from Eric and friends.  Would someone in the
> know care to divulge the goods: why is this?
>
> Has Eric suffered an accident?  Been incarcerated by the Australian
> spooks in retaliation for major contributions to crypto deployment?
> Has he been bought out by the dark side (say microsoft?).  Had a major
> change of philosophy regarding open source?  EAY was amongst the
> "least likely to go closed source" I thought.
>
> What gives?

I seem to to recall sometime ago when he was being pressured by the Oz
Gubmint, and decided that going corporate was a decent way out.  From what
I recall, he ended up on the RSA payroll.

Sayonara buggy freeware.





Thread