“Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com> (9 posts)
Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.
Threads
Re: Legal Definition of Encryption?
- 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 00:44:32 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legal Definition of Encryption? - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>
Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?]
- 1996-11-13 (Wed, 13 Nov 1996 01:11:21 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Not. [Was Re: Federal Reserve Bank is ILLEGAL?] - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>
Database law… silver lining??
- 1996-11-22 (Thu, 21 Nov 1996 20:44:44 -0800 (PST)) - Database law… silver lining?? - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>
Re: Database law… silver lining??
- 1996-11-22 (Fri, 22 Nov 1996 03:03:44 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Database law… silver lining?? - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>
Re: Crypto reg clarification from Commerce Department
- 1997-01-03 (Fri, 3 Jan 1997 05:20:15 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Crypto reg clarification from Commerce Department - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>
Re: “Technical data” exemptions in new crypto regs
- 1997-01-21 (Tue, 21 Jan 1997 01:18:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “Technical data” exemptions in new crypto regs - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>
Re: “Technical data” exemptions in new crypto regs
- 1997-01-21 (Tue, 21 Jan 1997 07:11:40 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “Technical data” exemptions in new crypto regs - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>
Re: “Technical data” exemptions in new crypto regs
- 1997-01-22 (Wed, 22 Jan 1997 02:29:10 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “Technical data” exemptions in new crypto regs - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>
Re: “Technical data” exemptions in new crypto regs
- 1997-01-22 (Wed, 22 Jan 1997 04:25:42 -0800 (PST)) - Re: “Technical data” exemptions in new crypto regs - “Richard L. Field” <field@pipeline.com>