“James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com> (22 posts)

Be aware that many list participants used multiple email addresses over their time active on the list. As such this page may not contain all threads available.

Threads

RE: VCRPLUS Huffman code

• 1995-09-05 (Tue, 5 Sep 95 15:13:33 PDT) - RE: VCRPLUS Huffman code - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <tunny@Inference.COM>

RE: Equinox/cypherpunks/www

• 1995-09-06 (Wed, 6 Sep 95 07:49:18 PDT) - RE: Equinox/cypherpunks/www - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <tunny@Inference.COM>

Local news botches RSA story

• 1996-02-07 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 13:39:02 +0800) - Local news botches RSA story - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <tunny@inference.com>

RE: Private key server

• 1996-09-20 (Fri, 20 Sep 1996 10:08:39 +0800) - RE: Private key server - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning

• 1996-10-05 (Sat, 5 Oct 1996 13:14:12 +0800) - RE: DESCrack keyspace partitioning - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

DSP wrinkle removal (was Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?)

• 1996-10-09 (Wed, 9 Oct 1996 07:20:27 -0700 (PDT)) - DSP wrinkle removal (was Voice Stress Analysis of Debates?) - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: USPS electronic postmark

• 1996-10-17 (Thu, 17 Oct 1996 08:27:37 -0700 (PDT)) - RE: USPS electronic postmark - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: Montgolfiering, the Hot Air Balloon of Cryptography

• 1996-10-30 (Wed, 30 Oct 1996 07:33:30 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Montgolfiering, the Hot Air Balloon of Cryptography - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: Discrete logs 1

• 1996-11-01 (Fri, 1 Nov 1996 07:41:03 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Discrete logs 1 - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: Information [for new PGP user]

• 1996-11-07 (Thu, 7 Nov 1996 14:31:50 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Information [for new PGP user] - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: WinKrypt

• 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:22:20 -0800 (PST)) - RE: WinKrypt - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: Validating a program

• 1996-11-08 (Fri, 8 Nov 1996 09:42:53 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Validating a program - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
  • 1996-11-09 (Sat, 9 Nov 1996 10:10:38 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Validating a program - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

FW: Validating a program

• 1996-11-11 (Mon, 11 Nov 1996 10:36:00 -0800 (PST)) - FW: Validating a program - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
  • 1996-11-12 (Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:06:16 -0800 (PST)) - Returned mail: User Unknown - Open Net Postmaster <postmaster@opennet.net.au>

RE: Apology to Dale Thorn

• 1996-11-11 (Mon, 11 Nov 1996 11:45:52 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Apology to Dale Thorn - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
  • 1996-11-12 (Tue, 12 Nov 1996 00:45:11 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Apology to Dale Thorn - Dale Thorn <dthorn@gte.net>

RE: [REBUTTAL] Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly News

• 1996-11-15 (Fri, 15 Nov 1996 12:16:47 -0800 (PST)) - RE: [REBUTTAL] Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly News - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
  • 1996-11-16 (Sat, 16 Nov 1996 02:08:56 -0800 (PST)) - RE: [REBUTTAL] Censorship on cypherpunks?, from The Netly News - aga <aga@dhp.com>

RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible

• 1996-12-03 (Tue, 3 Dec 1996 06:54:04 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
  • 1996-12-03 (Tue, 3 Dec 1996 07:38:17 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
  • 1996-12-03 (Tue, 3 Dec 1996 12:53:34 -0800 (PST)) - Cool site - Wolf <dlchris@minot.ndak.net>

[Noise]RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible

• 1996-12-04 (Wed, 4 Dec 1996 08:23:35 -0800 (PST)) - [Noise]RE: Modulating the FM noise spectrum considered infeasible - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

[OFF-TOPIC] RE: (Fwd) Books for Children’s Hospitals

• 1996-12-12 (Thu, 12 Dec 1996 10:59:09 -0800 (PST)) - [OFF-TOPIC] RE: (Fwd) Books for Children’s Hospitals - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: Legality of requiring credit cards? (fwd)

• 1996-12-23 (Mon, 23 Dec 1996 12:18:48 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Legality of requiring credit cards? (fwd) - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
  • 1996-12-23 (Mon, 23 Dec 1996 14:41:22 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Legality of requiring credit cards? (fwd) - “David Lesher / hated by RBOC’s in 5 states” <wb8foz@wauug.erols.com>

RE: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now?

• 1997-01-08 (Wed, 8 Jan 1997 08:00:51 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now? - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>
  • 1997-01-08 (Wed, 8 Jan 1997 12:59:50 -0800 (PST)) - RE: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now? - “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
    • 1997-01-08 (Wed, 8 Jan 1997 13:17:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now? - Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>
      • 1997-01-10 (Thu, 9 Jan 1997 21:35:33 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Why are 1024 bit keys the limit right now? - Jason Burrell <jburrell@crl.crl.com>

RE: David Kahn advocates GAK

• 1997-01-22 (Wed, 22 Jan 1997 12:23:29 -0800 (PST)) - RE: David Kahn advocates GAK - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>

RE: David Kahn advocates GAK

• 1997-01-23 (Wed, 22 Jan 1997 16:26:18 -0800 (PST)) - RE: David Kahn advocates GAK - “James A. Tunnicliffe” <Tunny@inference.com>