From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
To: gnu@cygnus.com
Message Hash: 85bf1b529ac7f0ed67423c59c35efc0036b3344f95a66287da6187b21deec4c8
Message ID: <9210131851.AA07309@newsu.shearson.com>
Reply To: <9210131800.AA10408@cygnus.com>
UTC Datetime: 1992-10-13 20:25:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 13:25:13 PDT
From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 92 13:25:13 PDT
To: gnu@cygnus.com
Subject: Mail headers
In-Reply-To: <9210131800.AA10408@cygnus.com>
Message-ID: <9210131851.AA07309@newsu.shearson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>From: gnu@cygnus.com
>We have standards already for a fully encrypted email system. It's
>called PEM, Privacy Enhanced Mail. It'd be completely senseless to come
>up with a different format at this point, as PEM is on the verge of
>deployment.
One might have a good reason to follow most of PEMs formatting
standards and the like; I'd fully agree its foolish in the extreme to
do otherwise. However, some of us don't like PEMs hierarchical key
authentication concepts.
Perry
Return to October 1992
Return to “pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)”