1992-11-14 - The legality of PGP
Header Data
From: S.E. Brown <shawnb@ecst.csuchico.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 79261358f54f62dfe12b82c2074e3bee708edf7601772b1fb354760e48a2dc62
Message ID: <9211140007.AA19365@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-11-14 00:07:22 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 16:07:22 PST
Raw message
From: S.E. Brown <shawnb@ecst.csuchico.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 16:07:22 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: The legality of PGP
Message-ID: <9211140007.AA19365@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Well,
I've been reading a lot of speculation and outright disinformation about
the legality of PGP. Does anyone have any informed information about the
actual legal status us sing and disseminating the program?
Gratis
My SuperIllegal Key :
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.0
mQCNAirSjlcAAAED/ijVaTjlU62mQdXwxj+bEO3wqdMKkZlRNt1rSi8VOSkeQ0G7
7KbBeINoVCTIi12ax74q7ANhKCga+ZkBxAVTnfSBQZXfFh/5XMxzzqk7NT2fKKlZ
/Hrf4cDd8VYgSl6WPhyVO+EpvyZn5HezGLBbryGpCcloSmjBcwd2g1pYVIhjAAUR
tCxTLkUuIEJyb3duIDxzaGF3bmJAY3NjaWhwLmVjc3QuY3N1Y2hpY28uZWR1Pg==
=Wrv7
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Thread
Return to November 1992
- Return to “pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)”
- Return to “S.E. Brown <shawnb@ecst.csuchico.edu>”
Return to “tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)”
- 1992-11-14 (Fri, 13 Nov 92 16:07:22 PST) - The legality of PGP - S.E. Brown <shawnb@ecst.csuchico.edu>
- 1992-11-16 (Mon, 16 Nov 92 11:26:52 PST) - The legality of PGP - pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
- 1992-11-17 (Mon, 16 Nov 92 18:19:20 PST) - The legality of PGP - tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)
- 1992-11-16 (Mon, 16 Nov 92 11:26:52 PST) - The legality of PGP - pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)