1992-12-17 - TEMPEST Question

Header Data

From: Doug.Brightwell@Corp.Sun.COM (Doug Brightwell)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 300017e6b63df0654936e611c40b0c6300ad40ec91f7666be8ca1e4562a7e70c
Message ID: <9212172348.AA01767@media.Corp.Sun.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1992-12-17 23:48:52 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 15:48:52 PST

Raw message

From: Doug.Brightwell@Corp.Sun.COM (Doug Brightwell)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 15:48:52 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: TEMPEST Question
Message-ID: <9212172348.AA01767@media.Corp.Sun.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Am I correct in understanding that what's actually detected and
reconstructed by TEMPEST surveillance is the EMR having to do with
screen drawing, and not the CPU and other internal components involved
in processing data?

If that's the case, would computers without CRT-type displays still be
succeptible to TEMPEST surveillance? Such as headless servers that
might be running a BBS without a video card inside or a monitor. Or
laptops, such as a Mac PowerBook with an active-matrix screen?

Thanks,
Doug




Thread