1992-12-18 - my mistake (re: TEMPEST)

Header Data

From: yanek@novavax.nova.edu (Yanek Martinson)
To: yanek@novavax.nova.edu (Yanek Martinson)
Message Hash: 31a08d9b9c0969ab495798e5a7f6a373947d59444d5cc5f64bc4c014ad78b804
Message ID: <9212180122.AA26838@novavax.nova.edu>
Reply To: <9212180027.AA24433@novavax.nova.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1992-12-18 01:23:42 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 17:23:42 PST

Raw message

From: yanek@novavax.nova.edu (Yanek Martinson)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 17:23:42 PST
To: yanek@novavax.nova.edu  (Yanek Martinson)
Subject: my mistake (re: TEMPEST)
In-Reply-To: <9212180027.AA24433@novavax.nova.edu>
Message-ID: <9212180122.AA26838@novavax.nova.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> > reconstructed by TEMPEST surveillance is the EMR having to do with
> > screen drawing, and not the CPU and other internal components involved
> 
> Cpu signal is the easiest to detect, but not the only one.  Other possible

Sorry, I meant "display signal". 






Thread