From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0017e797751442f6c677f71b873228e02f3d78353687126cff2f4465e85a3336
Message ID: <9301211636.AA02255@soda.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <9301160118.AA14215@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-21 16:38:55 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 08:38:55 PST
From: Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 08:38:55 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: random remailers
In-Reply-To: <9301160118.AA14215@toad.com>
Message-ID: <9301211636.AA02255@soda.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>> Has anyone thought about the consequence of randomly picking a
>> remailing path instead of using the same one?
>what if the remailer flips a coin, choosing between final delivery
>and remailing through another of its ilk. "message delivery with
>probability one ..."
This is an excellent suggestion. I have to think about the
mathematical properties some more, but a few spring to mind. Assume,
for discussion, that there is constant probability of delivery at each
hop, say p.
First, the expected number of hops is 1/p. To see this just sum the
following series.
$ E(p) = \Sum_{n=1}^{\infinity} n p (p-1)^{n-1} $
Thus the syntax for routing can be extremely simple, just specifying
the expected number of hops wanted. If you want to have guaranteed
minimum delivery, you can manually route through a few hops, then
randomize.
Eric
Return to January 1993
Return to “tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)”