1993-01-15 - random remailers
Header Data
From: tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bcd3e3c32692e9a6808f549da620748ca34d305620262dfc841b81c04f4940aa
Message ID: <9301151822.AA13343@xanadu.xanadu.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-15 19:35:19 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Jan 93 11:35:19 PST
Raw message
From: tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 93 11:35:19 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: random remailers
Message-ID: <9301151822.AA13343@xanadu.xanadu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Has anyone thought about the consequence of randomly picking a
remailing path instead of using the same one? It occurred to me
yesterday that randomly picked paths could reveal more information to
the remailer sites so that they could figure out the connection
between a pseudonym and the eventual destination pretty well. It's
just an intuition at this point, though.
dean
Thread
Return to January 1993
- Return to “Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>”
- Return to “Eric Messick <eric@parallax.com>”
- Return to “peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>”
- Return to “tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)”
Return to “tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)”
- 1993-01-15 (Fri, 15 Jan 93 11:35:19 PST) - random remailers - tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)
- 1993-01-15 (Fri, 15 Jan 93 15:45:21 PST) - Re: random remailers - Eric Messick <eric@parallax.com>
- 1993-01-16 (Fri, 15 Jan 93 17:18:58 PST) - Re: random remailers - peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
- 1993-01-21 (Thu, 21 Jan 93 08:38:55 PST) - random remailers - Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>
- 1993-01-17 (Sat, 16 Jan 93 23:45:44 PST) - Ideal Remailers - tcmay@netcom.com (Timothy C. May)