1993-01-11 - Politics of Rmailers

Header Data

From: tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)
To: Cypherpunks@toad.COM
Message Hash: d883bff2bb20bb699ed601b7a2264dda6c0dea26d79c1bb69a454b097f0c8f3e
Message ID: <9301110548.AA14295@xanadu.xanadu.com>
Reply To: <9301110143.AA15332@ucunix.san.uc.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-01-11 06:30:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 22:30:18 PST

Raw message

From: tribble@xanadu.com (E. Dean Tribble)
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 93 22:30:18 PST
To: Cypherpunks@toad.COM
Subject: Politics of Rmailers
In-Reply-To: <9301110143.AA15332@ucunix.san.uc.edu>
Message-ID: <9301110548.AA14295@xanadu.xanadu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	 >E.> I can imagine it, but none exist.  This is mostly because the From:
	 >                          ^^^^^^^^^^^
	 >*Bzzzzt* Wrong answer, thank you for playing.  The public access bbs

Yes.  Absolutes are almost always wrong.  I've never encountered such
a system, however.

	 Chael>      I think what he's saying is that a signature that identifies which
	 Chael> *user* on the system as well as the system name does not exist.  I'm

There are lots of mailers that add the X-Organization: field, or some such.

	 Evidently I mis-interpreted his exact meaning in his statement, but if I

Now now.  No need to be too sarcastic.  :-)

dean





Thread