From: Eric Fogleman <Eric.Fogleman@analog.com>
To: thug@phantom.com
Message Hash: 7ab468b53e140757d2528510e5cefdb2415a090435f86d0e3bcf217b48831b78
Message ID: <9302051849.AA18299@ack.adstest.analog.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-02-05 18:52:13 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Feb 93 10:52:13 PST
From: Eric Fogleman <Eric.Fogleman@analog.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 93 10:52:13 PST
To: thug@phantom.com
Subject: RE: 'Sunday Times' article on GSM changes
Message-ID: <9302051849.AA18299@ack.adstest.analog.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
(Thug writes)
> According to what I read it seems that the whole issue of cellular radio
> signal encryption is really a non-issue. They could have the most secure
...
> What makes you think they don't have the same kind of REMOB/BLV capability
> to the cellular telephone switches? I mean, if a conversation is scrambled
...
If getting around GSM encryption is no problem, then why are governments
pushing the issue?
Eric Fogleman
Return to February 1993
Return to “thug@phantom.com (Murdering Thug)”