1993-03-04 - Re: You Aren’t [I’m Not]

Header Data

From: Peter Honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
To: CypherPunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ae39cd2072b6a7611a3cc1f3d564e7574c3061768bd4289f9366a432d9fdb94c
Message ID: <9303040224.AA01178@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-03-04 02:24:15 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 3 Mar 93 18:24:15 PST

Raw message

From: Peter Honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 93 18:24:15 PST
To: CypherPunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
Message-ID: <9303040224.AA01178@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


    Date: Wed, 3 Mar 93 12:41:48 -0500
    From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@Athena.MIT.EDU>
    Subject: Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
    
                                                  ... I don't believe in
    prior restraint; but I do believe in personal responsibility ...
    
    ... in this model, how can you provide personal responsibility?  

ted, when you say you favor personal responsibility, do you mean
"i am in favor of people acting responsibly," which i take to be the
sense of the first quote, or do you mean "i want there to be a way to
hold people responsible for their actions," which i take to be the
meaning of the second?

(i favor the former, but am undecided about the latter.  not that
anyone asked ...)

    peter

ps:  pardon my wild excerpting; i hope it doesn't obscure.





Thread