From: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
To: eaeu362@orion.oac.uci.edu
Message Hash: 1aa4ebdd612c50d6ffc127804e2a183e3ae3796b8c723960ed4e88d886747510
Message ID: <9305122249.AA00229@servo>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-12 22:50:22 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 12 May 93 15:50:22 PDT
From: karn@qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Date: Wed, 12 May 93 15:50:22 PDT
To: eaeu362@orion.oac.uci.edu
Subject: Re: CALLER ID?
Message-ID: <9305122249.AA00229@servo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Interesting. As expected, when I called 1-800-235-1414 from a PBX
extension here at work, it read back the trunk number, not my actual
extension number. The same for a developmental CDMA digital
cellphone, since we use PBX-style trunks from our switch.
But when I called it from a conventional AMPS (FM) cell phone using
Pac Tel Cellular, I also got a number that was different than my
mobile's real number. And when I called it back, I got a
number-not-valid intercept.
Interesting. Apparently one real cellular switch also looks like a PBX
as far as ANI goes. I wonder how widespread this is. Anybody with a
cell phone on a service other than Pac Bell who is willing to give it
a try?
Phil
Return to May 1993
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <pmetzger@lehman.com>”