1993-05-29 - Re: forged Sternlight posting?
Header Data
From: peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
To: “” L. Detweiler “” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Message Hash: 54b82c9fe43af868d0baf7e9d2ab91bf4059c8a2bcd04d1615da374e6e719320
Message ID: <9305281918.AA09887@cygnus.com>
Reply To: <9305280504.AA05292@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-29 04:33:51 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 28 May 93 21:33:51 PDT
Raw message
From: peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 May 93 21:33:51 PDT
To: "" L. Detweiler "" <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Subject: Re: forged Sternlight posting?
In-Reply-To: <9305280504.AA05292@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Message-ID: <9305281918.AA09887@cygnus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> Apparently someone has forged a Sternlight posting on sci.crypt and
> alt.privacy.clipper. If the author can hear me: you should be severely
> ashamed. ...
>
> Cypherpunks, maybe we can help track down the culprit. ...
>
> Cypherpunks are sneaky, but not sleazy. ...
go hang with spaf if you want to deal out this kind of bullshit.
cypherpunks are not the cops of the net.
peter
Thread
Return to May 1993
- Return to “"”L. Detweiler”” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>”
Return to “peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>”
- 1993-05-28 (Thu, 27 May 93 22:04:29 PDT) - forged Sternlight posting? - "”L. Detweiler”” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
- 1993-05-29 (Fri, 28 May 93 21:33:51 PDT) - Re: forged Sternlight posting? - peter honeyman <honey@citi.umich.edu>