1993-05-28 - forged Sternlight posting?

Header Data

From: ““L. Detweiler”” <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6adaef5a97e65a85dfc85ed7b35f68907bae23ac09d6a290899de42d577e32e5
Message ID: <9305280504.AA05292@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-05-28 05:04:29 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 May 93 22:04:29 PDT

Raw message

From: ""L. Detweiler"" <ld231782@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 May 93 22:04:29 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: forged Sternlight posting?
Message-ID: <9305280504.AA05292@longs.lance.colostate.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Apparently someone has forged a Sternlight posting on sci.crypt and
alt.privacy.clipper. If the author can hear me: you should be severely
ashamed. I've said before that Sternlight is actually (in a warped way)
a *resource* to the net because of his representation of the NSA and
`fuzzy-brained public' opinion. Without him, we'd have nothing but all
of ourselves in a bland choir.

Cypherpunks, maybe we can help track down the culprit. The forgery says
`recently, some have called me a dupe'. Perhaps it is an allusion to a
recent flame war wherein the counterfeiter participated.

Cypherpunks are sneaky, but not sleazy. I look forward to the day when
digital signatures and other authentication methods make forged
postings like this a strange historical anachronism.

------- Forwarded Message





Thread