From: stig@netcom.com (Stig)
To: Marc Horowitz <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Message Hash: b80b51c913dd6b8c67cc1707225de9981eeecb410eabfbc8ae37f8f4a78d0806
Message ID: <9306090843.AA10157@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9306082054.AA14005@dun-dun-noodles.aktis.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-09 08:43:09 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Jun 93 01:43:09 PDT
From: stig@netcom.com (Stig)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 93 01:43:09 PDT
To: Marc Horowitz <honey@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: Re: CERT: the letter from CERT to berkeley.edu admin
In-Reply-To: <9306082054.AA14005@dun-dun-noodles.aktis.com>
Message-ID: <9306090843.AA10157@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
To quote: Marc Horowitz <marc@GZA.COM>
> "Do not attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by
> stupidity." Without support, I think CERT is merely being stupid.
> Someone else (maybe even a government employee) is being malicious. I
> do think cert is harming their effectiveness by doing this. My guess
> is that they never stopped to think that someone might use them in
> this way to shut down an "unpopular" ftp site.
>
Sounds like this thread is getting too soft on CERT:
For soda, the mail went to someone@soda....
For Julf's machine, it went to his NETWORK PROVIDER. (This is not a
courteous move, nor was it intended to be.)
Stig
/* Jonathan Stigelman, Stig@netcom.com, PGP public key by finger */
/* fingerprint = 32 DF B9 19 AE 28 D1 7A A3 9D 0B 1A 33 13 4D 7F */
Return to June 1993
Return to “stig@netcom.com (Stig)”