From: smb@research.att.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c69b93467e52c92a82f9311bc10ecc080f8f38c905ba3b91e582323f9e8e2bc2
Message ID: <9306161515.AA12958@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-06-16 15:15:48 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 16 Jun 93 08:15:48 PDT
From: smb@research.att.com
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 93 08:15:48 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: fast des
Message-ID: <9306161515.AA12958@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
how fast is fast des these days? (i have measured over 2 mbps
on decent workstations.)
i was in a meeting today attended by someone from nsa who said
that 2.4 gbps des chips exists today. (he got real silent after
blurting this out. hmm.)
2.4 gbps is 37.5 million des per sec.
it is probably not much challenge to put together a 65,536 element
machine, which would run at 2.5 trillion des per sec. if i have my
arithmetic right, this could exhaustively test the space of 56 bit
keys in about eight hours.
I don't know of any 2.4 gbps DES chips, but DEC has built a 1 gbps
chip. They've even published a technical report on it, though I don't
have the number handy. But there's more to know than simply the raw
speed.
First of all, most real DES chips -- i.e., those designed for
encryption, rather than brute-force cryptanalysis -- are optimized for
encrypting large blocks of data. Key-loading is a different operation,
and that might not go nearly as fast. Any hardware assists (i.e., DMA)
would be for the data, not for the next key to use on the same block of
data.
Second, what does this chip cost? If it costs, say, 10x what the DEC
chip costs, it's not cost-effective; you can build your DES-cracker
more cheaply with the slower chips. (The DEC TR gave cost figures for
DES-cracking...)
Return to June 1993
Return to “Tom Knight <tk@reagan.ai.mit.edu>”