1993-07-15 - Re: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
Header Data
From: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Message Hash: 9a556146853c5525ee6b390239166ba353dc0e4f69af29f0b7888b488d555921
Message ID: <9307151828.AA08970@banff.procase.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1993-07-15 18:29:13 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 11:29:13 PDT
Raw message
From: peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 11:29:13 PDT
To: wcs@anchor.ho.att.com
Subject: Re: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article)
Message-ID: <9307151828.AA08970@banff.procase.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>> typically a court order, to both key escrow authorities.
>"Typically", of course, means "not always", and it's coupled with the phrase
I think they must be implicitly refering to the anti terrorist act
which allows surveillence without a court order if national security
is involved or if foreign nationals are involved, etc.
Thread
Return to July 1993
- Return to “cdodhner@indirect.com (Christian D. Odhner)”
- Return to “J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>”
Return to “peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)”
- 1993-07-15 (Thu, 15 Jul 93 11:29:13 PDT) - Re: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article) - peb@PROCASE.COM (Paul Baclace)
- 1993-07-15 (Thu, 15 Jul 93 13:11:16 PDT) - Re: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article) - cdodhner@indirect.com (Christian D. Odhner)
- 1993-07-15 (Thu, 15 Jul 93 16:45:39 PDT) - Re: The right to be secure (fwd Computerworld article) - J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>