1993-08-11 - Re: Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Order research

Header Data

From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
To: gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore)
Message Hash: 3153997fcd41e6c0e4e26a5aebb9decb7fb37003c50705882846c1face914ad2
Message ID: <199308111810.AA02594@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
Reply To: <9308111723.AA07380@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-11 18:16:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 11:16:59 PDT

Raw message

From: paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 11:16:59 PDT
To: gnu@toad.com (John Gilmore)
Subject: Re: Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Order research
In-Reply-To: <9308111723.AA07380@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199308111810.AA02594@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

A recent _Scientific American_ had a brief piece on inducing order in
chaotic systems; I don't have it handy, but apparently it's fairly
simple to induce order in some nonlinear systems.

I'm no chaotician, but it seems that if you want to synchronize two
chaos generators at different sites, you must a) use the same initial
values and b) use the same mechanism to induce order. Granted that
small changes in a) or b) can change the system greatly, this doesn't
seem all that different from conventional synchronized encryption
systems.

(I'm happy to note that much of this work is being done at Georgia
Tech, my alma mater. It's great to be a fuzzy bee!)

- -Paul

- -- 
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG     | "Crypto-anarchy means never having to say
perobich@ingr.com          |  you're sorry." - Tim May (tcmay@netcom.com)
Intergraph Federal Systems | Be a cryptography user- ask me how.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLGk15SA78To+806NAQFLyQQAoZkg0VNeLCpfyqBtIDOsXcZQtBt0lo/Z
gOSS8p1Q2hSYAaO6NgGAgZ3dsVBSaGVpoGxMoIGlzbjNbJ72BEIRxiz2Itt3ul/s
DGbCIvqU8omph0msq8s2a3FBAnwE/yHfCbSHBPqmqRL29Bif7SpNh5qAc5JpEXBT
IjrsgcVa83I=
=4Mbz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread