From: Tom Knight <tk@reagan.ai.mit.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cd5af515d02d2396cc27f83f78e571ff989be0ad3bc8c2c3f4b6f6661ca4cfe2
Message ID: <19930811185438.1.TK@ROCKY.AI.MIT.EDU>
Reply To: <199308111810.AA02594@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
UTC Datetime: 1993-08-11 18:56:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 11:56:59 PDT
From: Tom Knight <tk@reagan.ai.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 11:56:59 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Chaos harnessed for encryption / Fluctuations and Order research
In-Reply-To: <199308111810.AA02594@poboy.b17c.ingr.com>
Message-ID: <19930811185438.1.TK@ROCKY.AI.MIT.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
This is how I see the situation:
Neural Nets : Computers :: Chaotic analog encryption : DES
The chaotic encryption work depends on a secret algorithm, no less. If
you want a system which works, do it digitally. If you want to play and
get papers accepted to the next hot-topic-of-the-day conference, go play
with some op amps. If you want to play, there's an article in SciAm
this month on building a chaotic "encryption" machine. It probably
provides acceptable security if you use triple DES on signals prior to
sending them.
Return to August 1993
Return to “Tom Knight <tk@reagan.ai.mit.edu>”