1993-10-01 - Re: fido encryption.
Header Data
From: Andrew Purshottam <andy@autodesk.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 565cfbd3835d9c9621f778263d0797aa9ef0042e22f1a2416798db1b3b4462b8
Message ID: <9309302131.AA03025@meefun.autodesk.com>
Reply To: <9309300633.AA27652@triton.unm.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-01 01:42:28 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 18:42:28 PDT
Raw message
From: Andrew Purshottam <andy@autodesk.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 93 18:42:28 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: fido encryption.
In-Reply-To: <9309300633.AA27652@triton.unm.edu>
Message-ID: <9309302131.AA03025@meefun.autodesk.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Doesn't Fidonet have a long tradition of feuding and splitting
into "subnets", which is facilitated by the way they maintain their
nodelist files? An excited Fido'er expalined it to me one night at usenix
several years ago, but I had little interest in pc networking then.
Perhaps a encryption ok subset of fidonet could form? Anyone who knows
more about this care to comment?
Andy
Thread
- Return to September 1993
Return to October 1993
- Return to “Andrew Purshottam <andy@autodesk.com>”
- Return to “J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>”
- Return to “jet@netcom.com (J. Eric Townsend)”
Return to “khijol!erc (Ed Carp)”
- 1993-09-30 (Wed, 29 Sep 93 23:36:36 PDT) - fido encryption. - J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>
- 1993-09-30 (Thu, 30 Sep 93 00:36:58 PDT) - Re: fido encryption. - khijol!erc (Ed Carp)
- 1993-09-30 (Thu, 30 Sep 93 11:36:38 PDT) - fido encryption. - jet@netcom.com (J. Eric Townsend)
- 1993-10-01 (Thu, 30 Sep 93 18:42:28 PDT) - Re: fido encryption. - Andrew Purshottam <andy@autodesk.com>