From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 93 10:34:33 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP in FIDO
In-Reply-To: <9310031703.AA08643@netcom.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9310031733.AA26853@snark.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Doug Merritt says:
> "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com> said:
> > This is why, for instance, the maker of a knife can't
> >be arrested because the knife is used to kill someone instead of
> >cutting bread. The law is actually reasonable.
> 
> Sometimes it is and sometimes it isn't. I recall some years ago when
> bartenders were getting convicted for their patron's drunk driving
> accidents.

Most states have laws that specifically assign liability to bartenders
for serving intoxicated patrons. That is why they are liable in this
instance. The rule does not generalize, however. A supermarket is not
liable for the heart attack that an overweight patron gets from eating
too much ice cream, for instance, since there is no law specifically
altering the default legal rules to assign liability in such an instance.

> One can't always count on laws being reasonable,

Thats true, but in this instance they are not unreasonable.

Perry