1993-10-20 - Re: why anon bank acct?

Header Data

From: sameer@netcom.com (Sameer Parekh)
To: trebor@foretune.co.jp (Robert J. Woodhead)
Message Hash: b426741796a7ebbe00985826f986bf4ac23fc376754b310de22bccf336e81115
Message ID: <9310202047.AA07231@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9310200938.AA07858@dink.foretune.co.jp>
UTC Datetime: 1993-10-20 20:52:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Oct 93 13:52:40 PDT

Raw message

From: sameer@netcom.com (Sameer Parekh)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 93 13:52:40 PDT
To: trebor@foretune.co.jp (Robert J. Woodhead)
Subject: Re: why anon bank acct?
In-Reply-To: <9310200938.AA07858@dink.foretune.co.jp>
Message-ID: <9310202047.AA07231@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Robert J. Woodhead said:
> 
> Ray writes:
> 
> >   Simple. Privatize those parts of government so they can chose
> >the services they want to buy.
> 
> An admirable solution, but it does not take into account the vested
> interests involved.  The only way to deal with them is to design a
> new system that is sufficiently more efficient (and/or wealth
> generating) that they are better off supporting it than opposing
> it.  The U.S. Government has been under construction for over 200
> years; you are not going to break it apart so easily.
> 
> 
	I'd suggest that the politics discussion be taken to another
forum?

-- 
Sameer
sameer@netcom.com





Thread