1993-11-17 - Re: privacy and rights (long reply)

Header Data

From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
To: unicorn@access.digex.net (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: 78c3cf0fc228ccbb5e4b0fee48952eed0e9b64d692487b9f38b9ebde91f328c1
Message ID: <199311171731.MAA10268@eff.org>
Reply To: <199311170957.AA11339@access.digex.net>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-17 17:31:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 09:31:46 PST

Raw message

From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 09:31:46 PST
To: unicorn@access.digex.net (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: privacy and rights (long reply)
In-Reply-To: <199311170957.AA11339@access.digex.net>
Message-ID: <199311171731.MAA10268@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


I gracefully concede about 90% of the points made against mine in this
thread; as I stated, I was just providing food for thought, not proposing
any sort of legal theory. 

As the 10% remaining have nothing to do with crypto, I'm replying to them
in personal mail.

-- 
Stanton  McCandlish  mech@eff.org  1:109/1103   EFF  Online  Activist & SysOp
O P E N  P L A T F O R M   C R Y P T O P O L I C Y   O N L I N E  R I G H T S
N  E  T  W  O  R  K  I  N  G      V  I  R  T  U  A  L     C  U  L  T  U  R  E
I   N   F  O :  M   E   M   B   E   R   S   H   I   P  @  E  F  F  .  O  R  G





Thread