From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
To: unicorn@access.digex.net (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: 78c3cf0fc228ccbb5e4b0fee48952eed0e9b64d692487b9f38b9ebde91f328c1
Message ID: <199311171731.MAA10268@eff.org>
Reply To: <199311170957.AA11339@access.digex.net>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-17 17:31:46 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 09:31:46 PST
From: Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 09:31:46 PST
To: unicorn@access.digex.net (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: privacy and rights (long reply)
In-Reply-To: <199311170957.AA11339@access.digex.net>
Message-ID: <199311171731.MAA10268@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I gracefully concede about 90% of the points made against mine in this
thread; as I stated, I was just providing food for thought, not proposing
any sort of legal theory.
As the 10% remaining have nothing to do with crypto, I'm replying to them
in personal mail.
--
Stanton McCandlish mech@eff.org 1:109/1103 EFF Online Activist & SysOp
O P E N P L A T F O R M C R Y P T O P O L I C Y O N L I N E R I G H T S
N E T W O R K I N G V I R T U A L C U L T U R E
I N F O : M E M B E R S H I P @ E F F . O R G
Return to November 1993
Return to “Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>”