1993-11-17 - Re: privacy and rights (long reply)
Header Data
From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
To: unicorn@access.digex.net (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: a21bf5fdce655c015e64c0f23b0e36edc6b081deb52ff5df9e4dbf7b3f6b8333
Message ID: <199311171332.IAA07582@eff.org>
Reply To: <199311170957.AA11339@access.digex.net>
UTC Datetime: 1993-11-17 13:34:22 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 05:34:22 PST
Raw message
From: Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 05:34:22 PST
To: unicorn@access.digex.net (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: privacy and rights (long reply)
In-Reply-To: <199311170957.AA11339@access.digex.net>
Message-ID: <199311171332.IAA07582@eff.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Black Unicorn writes:
> Mike or another with legal expertise can correct me, but I
> believe it hasbeen shown more than once that privacy can be a
> necessary condition for freedom of expression.
In fact, the right to privacy has been held to be implicit in the
Bill of Rights. See Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965.
--Mike
Thread
Return to November 1993
- Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”
- Return to “Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>”
Return to “Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>”
- 1993-11-17 (Wed, 17 Nov 93 02:01:06 PST) - privacy and rights (long reply) - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
- 1993-11-17 (Wed, 17 Nov 93 05:34:22 PST) - Re: privacy and rights (long reply) - Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>
- 1993-11-17 (Wed, 17 Nov 93 09:31:46 PST) - Re: privacy and rights (long reply) - Stanton McCandlish <mech@eff.org>