1994-01-28 - Re: clipper pin-compatible chip

Header Data

From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: drzaphod@brewmeister.xstablu.com (DrZaphod)
Message Hash: 1961a7a4ecdad6f557c9699b93001e83fc4c9aed2580c133a1730a737b47cf16
Message ID: <8hG0kW200awRI2OEhU@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <m0pPPCs-0003DXC@brewmeister.xstablu.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-01-28 04:47:46 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 27 Jan 94 20:47:46 PST

Raw message

From: Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 94 20:47:46 PST
To: drzaphod@brewmeister.xstablu.com (DrZaphod)
Subject: Re: clipper pin-compatible chip
In-Reply-To: <m0pPPCs-0003DXC@brewmeister.xstablu.com>
Message-ID: <8hG0kW200awRI2OEhU@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


drzaphod@brewmeister.xstablu.com wrote:

> 	Couldn't one compress the IDEA key to 10 bytes and 3?
> The hardware wouldn't notice and since you'd be using an
> IDEA chip on both sides it could decompress and verify on the
> other end.

Sure - but you're still restricting the keyspace to 10 bytes.
Why not just forget trying to fit it into the clipper system and build a
better encryptor from the beginning?





Thread