1994-02-16 - Re: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses

Header Data

From: Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>
To: jpp@markv.com
Message Hash: 1790e885d7fa578daaea4d91c0cc1087d1098abdc964ffb7caabfe4444ff5a4e
Message ID: <Pine.3.87.9402152203.A8762-0100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <9402152047.aa11630@hermix.markv.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-16 06:19:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 22:19:46 PST

Raw message

From: Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 22:19:46 PST
To: jpp@markv.com
Subject: Re: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses
In-Reply-To: <9402152047.aa11630@hermix.markv.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.87.9402152203.A8762-0100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Looks like I got the whole field...

On Tue, 15 Feb 1994 jpp@markv.com wrote:

>   Go ahead, hit 'r' and see what you get.  How many of you get the
> whole verbose reply-to field?
> 
> j'
> 

Thread

• Return to February 1994

• Return to “Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>”
• Return to ““Jon ‘Iain’ Boone” <boone@psc.edu>”

• Return to “jpp@markv.com”

• 1994-02-16 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 20:59:46 PST) - RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses - jpp@markv.com
  • 1994-02-16 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 22:19:46 PST) - Re: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses - Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>
  • 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 03:50:14 PST) - Re: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses - “Jon ‘Iain’ Boone” <boone@psc.edu>