1994-02-16 - RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses

Header Data

From: jpp@markv.com
To: supose a magic number were here <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 6732d08a3ae8ce1782a359e48b9ceb6e4fce6f353eb25c1546cfa6afa7bd26ba
Message ID: <9402152047.aa11630@hermix.markv.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-16 04:59:46 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 20:59:46 PST

Raw message

From: jpp@markv.com
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 20:59:46 PST
To: supose a magic number were here <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses
Message-ID: <9402152047.aa11630@hermix.markv.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


  Go ahead, hit 'r' and see what you get.  How many of you get the
whole verbose reply-to field?

j'

Thread

• Return to February 1994

• Return to “Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>”
• Return to ““Jon ‘Iain’ Boone” <boone@psc.edu>”

• Return to “jpp@markv.com”

• 1994-02-16 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 20:59:46 PST) - RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses - jpp@markv.com
  • 1994-02-16 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 22:19:46 PST) - Re: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses - Chris Knight <cknight@crl.com>
  • 1994-02-16 (Wed, 16 Feb 94 03:50:14 PST) - Re: RFC822 compliant, and already deployed hack for return addresses - “Jon ‘Iain’ Boone” <boone@psc.edu>