From: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (cypherpunks)
Message Hash: 34af9e00d174c55f252644fc83a4bcfb9844d4bdcf733311ea309fdd41f2fda3
Message ID: <199402092116.NAA28863@netcom8.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9402091330.AA11900@vail.tivoli.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-09 21:17:27 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Feb 94 13:17:27 PST
From: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 94 13:17:27 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (cypherpunks)
Subject: Re: Crypto Regulation Reform
In-Reply-To: <9402091330.AA11900@vail.tivoli.com>
Message-ID: <199402092116.NAA28863@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike McNally sez:
>
>
> Robert Cain writes:
> > > Would disclosing the encryption algorithm put your patent claim at
> > > risk?
> >
> > 'Fraid so. R, S and A almost blew it by disclosing theirs in a paper
> > before filing.
>
> So your encryption algorithm (not the key exchange part; the
> bit-stream encryptor) is not a well-known (or at least published)
> algorithm? Hmm...
No, I am doing the same kind of thing as most people, using my protocol
to exchange an IDEA key for the actual real-time decrencr. (Short word
I just coined for decryptor/encryptor as in modem or codec :-)
Peace,
Bob
--
Bob Cain rcain@netcom.com 408-354-8021
"I used to be different. But now I'm the same."
--------------PGP 1.0 or 2.0 public key available on request.------------------
Return to February 1994
Return to “rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)”