From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
To: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Message Hash: 987b4a04924520782a9fdf3f78ebd3a204f37f1fd217d622ff9dfe493b7a703c
Message ID: <9402091330.AA11900@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <199402090147.RAA07091@mail.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-09 15:42:23 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Feb 94 07:42:23 PST
From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 94 07:42:23 PST
To: rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
Subject: Re: Crypto Regulation Reform
In-Reply-To: <199402090147.RAA07091@mail.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <9402091330.AA11900@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Robert Cain writes:
> > Would disclosing the encryption algorithm put your patent claim at
> > risk?
>
> 'Fraid so. R, S and A almost blew it by disclosing theirs in a paper
> before filing.
So your encryption algorithm (not the key exchange part; the
bit-stream encryptor) is not a well-known (or at least published)
algorithm? Hmm...
--
| GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com> |
| TAKE TWA TO CAIRO. ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX: |
| (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |
Return to February 1994
Return to “rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)”