1994-02-15 - Detweiler abuse again

Header Data

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 610015ae429eaa99f33be8acda39a026e222954bac1b61fc6cbdb28c65752e6d
Message ID: <9402152008.AA23021@ah.com>
Reply To: <ghMFbZi00VBA8ICUc0@andrew.cmu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-02-15 20:21:42 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 12:21:42 PST

Raw message

From: hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 94 12:21:42 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Detweiler abuse again
In-Reply-To: <ghMFbZi00VBA8ICUc0@andrew.cmu.edu>
Message-ID: <9402152008.AA23021@ah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>It might be more effective if you bounced messages from detweiler back
>to him, CC: postmaster

Why even bounce?  If you want to make the remailers do something with
unwanted mail, one could honor the remailing request, but not
anonymize it.

Eric

Thread

• Return to February 1994

• Return to “Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>”
• Return to “hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)”
• Return to ““Jon ‘Iain’ Boone” <boone@psc.edu>”

• Return to “Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>”

• 1994-02-15 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 09:33:58 PST) - Re: Detweiler abuse again - Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
  • 1994-02-15 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 10:01:41 PST) - Detweiler abuse again - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)
    • 1994-02-15 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 11:31:42 PST) - Re: Detweiler abuse again - “Jon ‘Iain’ Boone” <boone@psc.edu>
  • 1994-02-15 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 11:09:28 PST) - Re: Detweiler abuse again - Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>
    • 1994-02-15 (Tue, 15 Feb 94 12:21:42 PST) - Detweiler abuse again - hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)