1994-03-19 - Re: What’s so bad about a Surveillance State?

Header Data

From: Sam Shipman <ses@osf.org>
To: Jim_Miller@bilbo.suite.com
Message Hash: 1e566f9a5de4e0204637b4f7cdedc5afeeece4d62bf0ab3ad57760c607a5162f
Message ID: <9403190023.AA08187@postman.osf.org>
Reply To: <9403182331.AA10941@bilbo.suite.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-19 00:24:16 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 16:24:16 PST

Raw message

From: Sam Shipman <ses@osf.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 94 16:24:16 PST
To: Jim_Miller@bilbo.suite.com
Subject: Re: What's so bad about a Surveillance State?
In-Reply-To: <9403182331.AA10941@bilbo.suite.com>
Message-ID: <9403190023.AA08187@postman.osf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Read _Oath_Of_Fealty_ by Niven and Pournelle for some arguments in
favor.  Read _1984_ by George Orwell (already mentioned here, I think)
for some arguments against.

--Sam

Thread

• Return to March 1994

• Return to “jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)”

• Return to “Sam Shipman <ses@osf.org>”

• 1994-03-18 (Fri, 18 Mar 94 15:43:34 PST) - Re: What’s so bad about a Surveillance State? - jim@bilbo.suite.com (Jim Miller)
  • 1994-03-19 (Fri, 18 Mar 94 16:24:16 PST) - Re: What’s so bad about a Surveillance State? - Sam Shipman <ses@osf.org>