1994-03-11 - Re: Improvement of remailer security

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6ef3150b317b847c305d8e96ac5359f1b432c8d54f9fb044739ee941215ecbda
Message ID: <199403111259.AA03559@access3.digex.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-11 13:00:10 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 11 Mar 94 05:00:10 PST

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 94 05:00:10 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:  Improvement of remailer security
Message-ID: <199403111259.AA03559@access3.digex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


->\
I think the recent death-threat-to-Clinton desaster has made clear
that the remailers we have are not very secure, mainly because
incoming and outgoing mail seems to be monitored at many sites.
<-

Wait, the threat was posted with a remailer?

I heard about the threat, not the remailer....

Details?

-uni- (Dark)

Thread

• Return to March 1994

• Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>”

• Return to “Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>”

• 1994-03-11 (Fri, 11 Mar 94 05:00:10 PST) - Re: Improvement of remailer security - Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>
  • 1994-03-11 (Fri, 11 Mar 94 11:09:14 PST) - Re: Improvement of remailer security - Matthew J Ghio <mg5n+@andrew.cmu.edu>