From: Ed Switalski <E.Switalski@bnr.co.uk>
To: Harry Shapiro Hawk <habs@warwick.com>
Message Hash: 73ce27e8f8350a60a36e34f1de20295453a08c7401eb0e59ca7cd82895e7a341
Message ID: <199403241534.2542@bnsgs200.bnr.co.uk>
Reply To: <9403241451.AA00559@uucp.warwick.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-24 15:39:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 07:39:10 PST
From: Ed Switalski <E.Switalski@bnr.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 94 07:39:10 PST
To: Harry Shapiro Hawk <habs@warwick.com>
Subject: Re: Color Copiers
In-Reply-To: <9403241451.AA00559@uucp.warwick.com>
Message-ID: <199403241534.2542@bnsgs200.bnr.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
- Free Money ?
>X-Reposting Policy: Don't redistribute without permission. Rev.1.0.1
>
>We assumed then it was finding something located in the
>upper right half of the back of the dollar bill. When we
>attempted to isolate that part of the bill, it DID copy.
>
>Strange. Perhaps someone could look at a 1, 5, 10, 20
>and 100 dollar bill and see if there is anything in common
>in the upper right half of the back of those bills.
>
>Interestingly, when we did isolate the upper right half even
>though it copied, it didn't copy cleanly.
*** Dont most photocopiers have an automatic exposure control,
which like cheap photo devoping printing services, uses the
integrated light from the WHOLE object to set the exposure.
If there is an near-UV flourescent region in US bills, this would
interfere with photocopying by making the overall result
too dark.
Why not look for watermarks etc with a UV money-checking lamp
Then cut out (a very light red ?) UV filter to cover the offending
region when copying. Then paint on some UV-flouresent stuff on the
result. Et Voila free money!
BTW: Mines a Manhattan Ice Tea !
Return to March 1994
Return to ““Harry Shapiro Hawk” <habs@warwick.com>”