From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ef0534029e6ff624ee2f323c4551e38df6c2b70ab8155ac9e64f1bbb012a11bb
Message ID: <199403310605.WAA22633@jobe.shell.portal.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-03-31 06:04:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 30 Mar 94 22:04:59 PST
From: Hal <hfinney@shell.portal.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 94 22:04:59 PST
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Bekenstein Bound (was: Crypto and new computing strategies)
Message-ID: <199403310605.WAA22633@jobe.shell.portal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
The Deutsch paper I quoted before was where I first heard of the Bekenstein
Bound which Eric Hughes mentioned. According to Deutsch:
"If the theory of the thermodynamics of black holes is trustworthy, no
system enclosed by a surface with an appropriately defined area A can have
more than a finite number
N(A) = exp(A c^3 / 4 hbar G)
of distinguishable accessible states (hbar is the Planck reduced constant,
G is the gravitational constant, and c is the speed of light.)"
The reference he gives is:
Bekenstein, J.D. 1981 Phys Rev D v23, p287
For those with calculators, c is approximately 3.00*10^10 cm/s, G is
6.67*10^-8 cm^3/g s^2, and hbar is 1.05*10^-27 g cm^2/s. N comes out
to be pretty darn big by our standards!
Hal
Return to April 1994
Return to “ph@netcom.com (Peter Hendrickson)”