1994-04-20 - Re: remailer idea… ultimate in offshore siting?

Header Data

From: SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
To: pgf@srl01.cacs.usl.edu (Phil G. Fraering)
Message Hash: 70b93b7e1264b76b9fcf6c5c2dc11a4f2c315fd685f1713f4f19b6698e378bb6
Message ID: <94Apr20.184127edt.10119@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
Reply To: <199404202154.AA19144@srl03.cacs.usl.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-20 22:43:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Apr 94 15:43:04 PDT

Raw message

From: SINCLAIR  DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 94 15:43:04 PDT
To: pgf@srl01.cacs.usl.edu (Phil G. Fraering)
Subject: Re: remailer idea... ultimate in offshore siting?
In-Reply-To: <199404202154.AA19144@srl03.cacs.usl.edu>
Message-ID: <94Apr20.184127edt.10119@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> I've been reading the "remailer musings" thread, and it
> suddenly hit me: why not put the remailer in leo?

I'd had the same musing myself, except with geosynch.
Get the thing to generate its key once it's launched,
and send down the public half.  There's no way it
could by physically compromized.  NASA's shuttle
can't get that high.  I doubt the soviet shuttle could
either.  The only thing 'they' could do would be to
destroy or jam it.

When you say "Wouldn't cost _that_ much", I'd hazard
it's still out of the reach off all but big corporations.





Thread