1994-04-20 - remailer idea… ultimate in offshore siting?
Header Data
From: “Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c69142a8dc1ae30d117013dd16394935caa175d49fefc46b6ede5045f2a4f632
Message ID: <199404202154.AA19144@srl03.cacs.usl.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-20 21:58:57 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Apr 94 14:58:57 PDT
Raw message
From: "Phil G. Fraering" <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 94 14:58:57 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: remailer idea... ultimate in offshore siting?
Message-ID: <199404202154.AA19144@srl03.cacs.usl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I've been reading the "remailer musings" thread, and it
suddenly hit me: why not put the remailer in leo? It probably
wouldn't cost _that_ much, and you might make money from the
digital postage (if it ever comes out).
And if you were wondering, yes, I came up with this while
thinking about Teledesic. If the wires are going to be in
the sky, why not the machines?
Phil
Thread
Return to April 1994
- Return to ““Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>”
Return to “SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>”
- 1994-04-20 (Wed, 20 Apr 94 14:58:57 PDT) - remailer idea… ultimate in offshore siting? - “Phil G. Fraering” <pgf@srl.cacs.usl.edu>
- 1994-04-20 (Wed, 20 Apr 94 15:43:04 PDT) - Re: remailer idea… ultimate in offshore siting? - SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>