1994-04-27 - Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP

Header Data

From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
To: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message Hash: 7a649a7f712b301d8001173c2f0e9d9702aee913960bbf4bd7487e2365fb3c96
Message ID: <9404272018.AA19034@vail.tivoli.com>
Reply To: <199404271955.MAA16184@soda.berkeley.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-04-27 20:19:08 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Apr 94 13:19:08 PDT

Raw message

From: m5@vail.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 94 13:19:08 PDT
To: Sameer <sameer@soda.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: Faking hostnames and inconvenient anon IP
In-Reply-To: <199404271955.MAA16184@soda.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <9404272018.AA19034@vail.tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Sameer writes:
 > 	Well starting sometime this summer I'm going to start selling
 > shell accounts, and I don't plan on spending much time verifying
 > that there is a TrueName associated with any given account.

Most (all?) private PO box places won't give out a box without a
"real" US mail address and some form of ID.  Is this due to legal
requirements (direct or indirect)?  If so, can we not look forward to
such restrictions being placed on those who supply electronic PO
boxes?

--
| GOOD TIME FOR MOVIE - GOING ||| Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>       |
| TAKE TWA TO CAIRO.          ||| Tivoli Systems, Austin, TX:        |
|     (actual fortune cookie) ||| "Like A Little Bit of Semi-Heaven" |





Thread