From: allan@elvis.tamu.edu (Allan Bailey)
To: perry@imsi.com
Message Hash: 184d43429d1c598417feff7cf0f57c4edc4eafa3879538cdae02e8d086f45081
Message ID: <9405162042.AA00837@elvis.tamu.edu>
Reply To: <9405162013.AA00693@elvis.tamu.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-16 20:42:25 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 16 May 94 13:42:25 PDT
From: allan@elvis.tamu.edu (Allan Bailey)
Date: Mon, 16 May 94 13:42:25 PDT
To: perry@imsi.com
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 and the future
In-Reply-To: <9405162013.AA00693@elvis.tamu.edu>
Message-ID: <9405162042.AA00837@elvis.tamu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
bludy emacs VM doesn't stop you from sending an unsigned message yet.
i'm going to have to make a binding for that tonight.... grrr...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
>
>Allan Bailey says:
>> I'm willing to wager that 2.6 (and maybe 2.5) MIT'd PGP versions
>> are hacked by the NSA to put in a backdoor.
>> ^^^^^^^^^^ (emphasis added.)
>>
>> I'll bet you a C-note, Perry.
>
>Done for $100.
>
>> Now how do you propose to prove or disprove this?
>
>The commonly selected way to settle such things is to select a neutral
>referee to adjudicate based on available evidence. The source code is
>public, so it should it should be trivial to read it and make a
>decision as to whether anything untoward has been done. I'll accept
>any reasonably expert referee -- my selection of choice would be Hal
>Finney since he is a well known cypherpunk, is strongly familiar with
>the code and would recognise any tampering.
Well, Hal wanted to bet me too, but you were first. If he's still
willing, I'll agree to him also.
>Tampering may be defined
>given what you are claiming as the presense of what a reasonable
>cryptographer would refer to as a "back door".
Agreed.
>Once we've settled on a judge and they've
>accepted the charge (we may need to pay the person for their time), we
>present our evidence to the person and allow them to make a decision.
Agreed.
>I'll happily bet any larger sum, too, if you like.
I'm a University programmer/sysadmin. I.e., poor, but with a good
InterNet connection. :)
>I'd also request
>that a neutral third party hold the stakes. At your choice the party
>can be the judge or another individual mutually acceptable.
Sounds fine with me. If Hal, or another agreed upon judge is willing,
I'll send my cheque in.
- --
Allan Bailey, allan@elvis.tamu.edu | "Freedom is not free."
Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations | allan.bailey@tamu.edu
Esperanto: MondLingvo, lingvo internacia.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLdfadU19fA0AcDy9AQF6MgP+LNU5cbOIko4EyIXc8xkA3h3vQf6UOOIA
RsysJhbY8NWjtBZ2yI3yxewrLecb0+448tLmFjuPDM+ZlORcP7OPS30qMOzuO8oe
VZC/nWm+SvD2Rgh5T8pI5RjcbD8SLozBlcwMVdvnmEyxngCaRLmlBoMLWqmeom9k
RJ6PD0FHYKw=
=8pmK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1994
Return to ““Robert A. Hayden” <hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu>”