From: allan@elvis.tamu.edu (Allan Bailey)
Date: Mon, 16 May 94 13:13:35 PDT
To: Cypherpunks Mailing List <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: PGP 2.6 and the future
In-Reply-To: <9405162000.AA00650@elvis.tamu.edu>
Message-ID: <9405162013.AA00693@elvis.tamu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

"Perry E. Metzger" writes:
>
>Allan Bailey says:
>> I'm willing to wager that this 2.6 and maybe 2.5 versions are 
>> hacked by the NSA to put in their spiffy key-escrowed backdoor.
>
>How much are you willing to wager? I'll take the bet at any size.
>

WAit!  Let me correct that statement before I lose my shirt.

I'm willing to wager that 2.6 (and maybe 2.5) MIT'd PGP versions
are hacked by the NSA to put in a backdoor.
                                ^^^^^^^^^^ (emphasis added.)

I'll bet you a C-note, Perry.

Now how do you propose to prove or disprove this?

- -- 
Allan Bailey, allan@elvis.tamu.edu          | "Freedom is not free."
Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations | allan.bailey@tamu.edu
Esperanto: MondLingvo, lingvo internacia.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLdfTok19fA0AcDy9AQHKiwP/dtC8MQ40g0mnGrD2gnxDJVG+gtxl4enB
u35Gv0Yt7S5IVks+TJoyfv4SGT8tyjDrBbY7+ibOkM38VDsHPpg4IWQlM9I449EZ
9XgvCK5RvMVfBBpruRbQGCjz7b09MsAbUK3R/jerbYS7HwUkMZq7WBk269xDWBy6
sC6eHZGBN+k=
=nh85
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


PS:  just make make sure we agree on the definition of "C-note":

      C-note == $100.00 US