From: jkreznar@ininx.com (John E. Kreznar)
Date: Sun, 1 May 94 21:42:05 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Constitution and Contract [Was: CIA & FBI]
In-Reply-To: <199405012030.AA27999@access3.digex.net>
Message-ID: <9405020441.AA16709@ininx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Unicorn writes:

> Will a passport be issued to a non-citizen?

Do you anticipate an enduring role for passports?  What would be the
point of strong cryptography if it leaves intact institutions able to
enforce a demand for passports?  Are they not as much an invasion of
privacy as eavesdropping?  If passports continue to be of significance
in the future, wouldn't that indicate that strong cryptography has
failed to achieve its promise?

	John E. Kreznar		| Relations among people to be by
	jkreznar@ininx.com	| mutual consent, or not at all.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a

iQCVAgUBLcSD2cDhz44ugybJAQEU8gQAluPq6cGV82iLx5dHmmSyAUedq3VGv8aO
p05PnjUmbIbQMeMG4Q6wMfAVpmJ4OqZjO2wmhmb7oKRFZDojDYym+MqqrWx06shf
+Esb+WQ2Q7a/U5n1TEWamG+OA4URcBe/mb+TGOHurielkSjH3G3f0o6FVWB4Zep3
b5XCFqqjw8s=
=onZ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----