From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Message Hash: 4de7db495c64e0480b24bdf239a8783c319e23cc119f2ff02aa028815a1f6d75
Message ID: <9405270126.AA05354@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
Reply To: <199405270000.BAA11641@an-teallach.com>
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-27 00:24:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 May 94 17:24:10 PDT
From: paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
Date: Thu, 26 May 94 17:24:10 PDT
To: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Subject: Re: Unicorn vs. tmp@netcom
In-Reply-To: <199405270000.BAA11641@an-teallach.com>
Message-ID: <9405270126.AA05354@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
gtoal writes -
>
> Of course, no-one has considered the possibility that the tmp@netcom persona
> was manufactured and played out over time solely in order to boost the
> credibility of the 'uni' persona :-) [does anyone have any proof that
> *either* of these people exist in real life or that all this flurry of
> pseudo-legal action ever took place???]
>
> G(in the spirit of Detweiler, since LD isn't around to suggest it himself :-) )
>
Actually, I find it hard to lend credence to any soap-opera-type-scenarios
of this caliber played out by anonymous personas.
And I am a staunch supporter of anonymous-based systems, to say the least.
It does, however, give me my recommended daily allowance of chuckles in
the newsgroups. ,-)
- paul
Return to June 1994
Return to “paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)”