1994-05-27 - Re: Unicorn vs. tmp@netcom
Header Data
From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: df907fdda09d2da2fb9872b4c16bcc2c4ae756292238beffd69888e2c61a4a06
Message ID: <199405270000.BAA11641@an-teallach.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1994-05-27 00:00:29 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 May 94 17:00:29 PDT
Raw message
From: gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
Date: Thu, 26 May 94 17:00:29 PDT
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Unicorn vs. tmp@netcom
Message-ID: <199405270000.BAA11641@an-teallach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Of course, no-one has considered the possibility that the tmp@netcom persona
was manufactured and played out over time solely in order to boost the
credibility of the 'uni' persona :-) [does anyone have any proof that
*either* of these people exist in real life or that all this flurry of
pseudo-legal action ever took place???]
G(in the spirit of Detweiler, since LD isn't around to suggest it himself :-) )
Thread
- Return to May 1994
Return to June 1994
- Return to “gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)”
- Return to “mech@eff.org (Stanton McCandlish)”
Return to “paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)”
- 1994-05-27 (Thu, 26 May 94 17:00:29 PDT) - Re: Unicorn vs. tmp@netcom - gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)
- 1994-05-27 (Thu, 26 May 94 17:24:10 PDT) - Re: Unicorn vs. tmp@netcom - paul@hawksbill.sprintmrn.com (Paul Ferguson)
- 1994-06-06 (Mon, 6 Jun 94 07:44:48 PDT) - Re: Unicorn vs. tmp@netcom - mech@eff.org (Stanton McCandlish)